Bleepless AI brings Helios 1, our frontier model, to cybersecurity research, defensive analysis and authorized internal penetration testing. Ask direct technical questions without a blanket refusal just because the topic is security. Work through attack paths and fixes; you run and verify every test.
Built to engage with legitimate security work, with authorization as the line.
Helios 1 is Bleepless' most capable model for multi-step analysis, code and detailed follow-up. Its published base-model scores include graduate-level science and competitive coding; they are not cybersecurity-specific benchmarks.
Defensive research and internal penetration testing are in scope. Ask directly about a system you own or have permission to assess; unauthorized access and fraud remain off limits.
Bring code, configurations or sanitized logs. Work through a vulnerability, get a concrete remediation and regression test, then run and verify it in your own environment.
Set the scope
Create a Project with your architecture, test objectives, authorized targets and rules of engagement. Leave credentials and live secrets out.
Bring the evidence
Paste a code snippet, sanitized logs or a vulnerability write-up. Ask for assumptions, an explanation and a concrete way to validate the finding.
Test, fix, verify
Run the checks in your authorized environment. Bring back the results, refine the analysis and verify the remediation.
Tap one to start a chat with it.
Cybersecurity research, defensive analysis and penetration testing on systems you own or are authorized to assess are allowed. There is no blanket ban just because a question is about security. Unauthorized hacking and fraud are outside the Usage Rules.
Yes. It can help define scope, develop test cases, explain tool output and draft findings and remediation steps for systems you own or have permission to assess.
No. Bleepless Chat generates text and code; it does not connect to your network, run security tools or execute tests. You run and verify any suggested commands in your own authorized environment.
Treat each finding as a hypothesis to verify. The model can miss vulnerabilities, suggest an incorrect fix or invent details about a CVE. Check primary advisories, reproduce findings and test proposed changes before relying on them.
Helios 1 is our recommended starting point for detailed code review and multi-step analysis. It supports replies up to ~2,500 words and re-reads the last 80 messages. We have not published a cybersecurity-specific benchmark.
